Examensarbeit aus dem Jahr 2000 im Fachbereich Kunst - Architektur; Baugeschichte; Denkmalpflege; Note: 1;3; Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universitauml;t Bonn; Sprache: Deutsch; Abstract: Die Arbeit beschauml;ftigt sich mit der Frage; ob die gotisierenden Anteile der Jesuitenkirchen der niederhreinischen Provinz programmatischen Charakter fuuml;r die Missionstauml;tigkeit der Jesuiten hatten oder nicht. Dabei wird auch das weitere Tauml;tigkeitsfeld der Jesuiten im 16. Jahrhundert wie Erziehung; Theater oder Musik beleuchtet. Im Mittelpunkt der Arbeit steht die Kouml;lner Kirche St. Mariae Himmelfaht; die am Ende des 16. Jahrhunderts in unmittelbarer Nauml;he zum Dom; der erst seit circa 20 Jahren eine gotische Bauruine war; von den Jesuiten errichtet worden ist. Ist die Wahl des gotisierenden Baustils bei St. Mariae Himmelfahrt einer lokalen Kouml;lner Bautradition geschuldet oder wollten die Jesuiten damit ein Zeugnis fuuml;r ihre Katholizitauml;t ablegen; insofern der gotische Baustil als spezifisch mittelalterlich und damit katholisch aufgefasst worden ist?
#2637735 in eBooks 2013-10-11 2013-10-11File Name: B00BIP26NK
Review
0 of 0 people found the following review helpful. Highly RecommendedBy marsalunaBarbara McCloskeys book is a very good summary of international artistic reaction to WWII. It is a series of short but detailed and insightful summaries of artistic production and its relationship to the WWII in the countries that most prominently fought the war -- England; France; Italy; Germany; Russia; China and Japan -- followed by more in-depth essays on particular artists from each country. There is also material on Spanish art; incuding Picasso and the Spanish Civil War; a precursor of WWII. The chapters about China and Japan shed light on previously obscure material from those countries and the material on Western artists may challenge what you think you know about their politics and behavior during the war--who spoke out against the Nazis; who sat mute; who suffered and who profited.This is such a good discussion of WWII artists that Im sort of puzzled by the previous reviewers comments; its as if s/he is criticizing the author for not writing a different book rather than evaluating the one the author wrote. Really the single fault of the book is the relative lack of images. There are a number of color plates; but the author was apparently unable to secure the rights to some of the images she discusses. She gives citations to where they can be found; but; of course; it would have been nice to have them there to refer to.All in all; highly recommended.0 of 1 people found the following review helpful. A weak overviewBy Matthew WidmerThis is a weak overview for people who know nothing about art. One could write 3-4 books on the info left out of this book. A big letdown. Didnt cover U.S. art during the war in any meaningful way.