Learn to play the recorder and open up a brand new world of musical knowledge with this exciting method from Alfred. Beginners of all ages can start their journey to a lifetime of musical enjoyment. Beginning with the fundamentals; you will learn about choosing a recorder; how to care for your very own; how to hold it; producing a tone; and getting acquainted with standard musical notation. You will then move right along to playing different notes and songs; lesson by lesson; all while continuing to increase your knowledge of reading and understanding standard musical notation. You will be exposed to many periods of music history; from the 16th-century beauty of Greensleeves to When the Saints Go Marching In; Amazing Grace; La Bamba; This Land Is Your Land and dozens of others. The book features the following resources for reference during and after your lessons: * Complete note and fingering chart* Duets that can be played with othersBe your own teacher; and let Alfred be your resource every step of the way.
#290271 in eBooks 1995-11-20 2015-05-12File Name: B00EUUQ8A2
Review
3 of 5 people found the following review helpful. A long overdue assesmentBy Jerry RichardsonFirst of all; this is not the character assassination of Fuller that some had feared. Over the years since his death some critics have hinted that RBFS Chronofile and biography did not match up well as regards his early projects and career. This assessment is easy and very long overdue. The real fun starts with an assesment of his life from Nine Chains to the Moon on and an analysis of the source material of his ideas. This will be much more controversial and political than many think. This book partially clears the air on the early career of RBF and is well illustrated and researched.11 of 11 people found the following review helpful. Disappointing read; questionable scholarshipBy C. M. CookI have been reading Lorances book concurrently with "Fuller Houses" (Neder); "Your Private Sky" (Krausse and Lichtenstein) and "New Views on R. Buckminster Fuller" (Chu and Trujillo). Relative to these three excellent collections of essays I am disappointed by the lack of analysis and insight in Lorances biography. Certainly there is no outright "character assassination" of Fuller; but Lorances central thesis; that Fuller somewhat deceptively manufactured his identity as a visionary out of his failure as a businessman is not made salient or even especially interesting relative to other aspects of his remarkable life and character.Lorance barely discusses the tectonic transformation of the original Fuller/Lightful/4D/Dymaxion house from the patent application to the 1930 version. She includes much detail about RBFs employment history; and the early conceptualization of a corporation to build manufactured homes; but little about the design process which clearly made critical leaps over this period; both in the physical manifestation and the philosophical underpinnings. Lorance is insistant that Fuller willfully changed the house from a viable enterprise to a commercially impossible vision of the future but she fails to explain how the design evolved and was adapted to Fullers increasingly Utopian proposition. Lorance prefers looking for moments where Fuller seems to obfuscate; retract; or rearrange his history; while ignoring the concurrent process and development of his seminal project.I buy portions of Lorances argument; in particular that Fuller began Dymaxion with an earnest notion of a bone fide enterprise not as a pie-in-the-sky Utopian construct. But the reasons for that are straight forward: it was the industry he knew best; both in terms of techniques and contacts; he was concerned for his young family and their finances and wished to be held in some esteem by his extended family; particularly his father-in-law with whom things were sticky after Fullers problems at Stockade; and; finally; in the gestalt of the time enterprise and the entrepreneurial spirit were exalted.If anything Lorances book paints a picture of a man emerging from a protracted adolescence; one which required some earnest post-rationalizations to cover immature behavior. This in no way detracts from Fullers achievements; and makes him all the more human. By being less of a sleuth and more empathetic Lorance might have written a more insightful book.But my major beef with this book is what seems to be cherry picking scholarship in Lorances research. In one case -hopefully there are not more- she seems to avoid; indeed questions the existence of a document that contradicts her argument. Specifically; Lorance states (pg 155): "he [Fuller] planned to lecture at the Architecture League in July 1929 and solicit commentary from the audience for possible incorporation in the text" of a book about the Dymaxion House to be published by Scribners later that year. She then says "if the afternoon proceeded as planned; Fuller elected not to incorporate the suggestions." In her end notes Lorance claims her information about the event comes from another document; the "Draft of Invitation to Co-operative Lecture" Chronofile vol. 39 (1931) then states: "It is unknown if this invitation was sent or if the lecture was given as planned. There is nothing further in Fullers papers; and the author was not permitted to research in the archives of the Architecture League of Manhattan." (note 63 pg 264) Yet the transcript of this same lecture is reprinted in Your Private Sky; and a mimeographed copy of the text; recorded by a stenographer; is in Fullers Chronofile (Chronofile Vol. 36 (BFA) 1929)In this example Lorance does exactly what she accusses Fuller of doing: obfuscating; ignoring or slightly altering evidence to justify her interpretation of events. It is one thing for the subject of the biography to do this; but the biographer herself? She goes on to claim Scribners dropped a possible Dymaxion book in 1929 because Fuller was an inept writer and refused to use a ghost writer. Yet she does not give any solid evidence of this and worse; does not mention the fact of the stockmarket crash of October 1929 which was concurrent with the book contract discussion. (In fact some (certainly not all) of 4D Timelock is quite readable (extracts are in Your Private Sky) and is convincing of Fullers argument for manufactured housing). This is one example where context was left out in a way that could easily alter ones interpretation of an event.As I continue to fill in my knowledge of Fullers career I fear stumbling upon other inconsistencies and manipulation of the record in Lorances biography. There is some good scholarship here; but I am reading it now with a jaundiced eye.3 of 3 people found the following review helpful. geat new information on BuckyBy AnthThis book is a must for anyone seriously interested in the pre-geodesic dome years of Fuller. Its chatty tone is easy to read with the one exception being Chapter 5. This is easy to forgive; though; because that chapter is the only breakdown of "4D Timelock" and some of his other early writings which are tough to read themselves. Its surprising that Fuller unsuccessfully tried to get the book translated into French and published in early 1929. But; to learn about what Fuller did at Stockade; his circle of associates; and what else he did in the 1920s besides design the Dymaxion House; this book is the source. It even covers a little bit of the early 1930s.It is also nice because it offers new information on Fuller that is not found elsewhere and doesnt repeat most of the same information found in almost every other book on Fuller. Since her focus is on Fullers efforts to get the Dymaxion House into production; Lorance doesnt include the various towered versions of the house because he wasnt trying to get those into mass-production. She does include some very early sketches from a manuscript (not seen elsewhere) that relate to the patent design and then the final version of the house. She also discusses who helped Fuller develop the final version of the house. The book is about Fullers development and how the projects fit into that development; its not a study of the projects; a plethora of which can be found elsewhere. The book gives a convincing discussion of the popularity of the Dymaxion House model and that it was tossed out as garbage in 1939.There is an abundance of quotes allowing the reader to follow the process as it happened instead of how the author interprets it. For example; there are exchanges between Fuller and his father-in-law discussing Fullers ousting from Stockade and his efforts to get the AIA to take over responsibility of the Dymaxion House development. Lorance included some juicy footnotes as well; like the one listing what things happened on Fullers birthday in various years (he was married and his father died) and noting that Fuller had many affairs. While some readers may take issue with a few details; the book seems solidly researched. To me there were no glaring errors like the one in Krausse and Lichtensteins book that claims "4D Timelock" "pronounces against industrial construction" (p. 28).For someone looking for new information; the influences on Fullers early development and a clear analysis of his early work; this book is the one to read. Its strange that Micheal Lewis in the Wall Street Journal review claimed there is nothing new here and he even seemed disappointed that the book didnt trash Fuller. Its also surprising Jaimie Snyder echoed Lewiss claim that there is nothing new since the Fuller Estate considered not giving Lorance permission to publish the material it holds in copyright; like quotes and images. Some people might find her re-evaluation of Fullers biography and the notion of his personal myth troubling; but; the reassessment is based on material from Fullers papers. If Fuller didntwant this story told; its surprisig he kept the papers that contradict the well-known fairy tale about how he came to design the Dymaxion House. It also adds a new materials to Fuller studies and more room for discussion. It is true that the political and historical implications are yet to befleshed out. I highly recommend it.