Studienarbeit aus dem Jahr 2007 im Fachbereich Kunst - Installationen; Aktionskunst; moderne Kunst; Note: 1;5; Staatliche Akademie der Bildenden Kuuml;nste Stuttgart; 16 Quellen im Literaturverzeichnis; Sprache: Deutsch; Abstract: In einem Interview wirft Benjamin Buchloh Martha Rosler vor; ihr Werk sei "heterodox" . Dies wuuml;rde bedeuten; dass ihren Arbeiten eine Verbindung fehlt und sie mit jedem neuen Werk auch einen neuen Weg einschlauml;gt. Ihre Themen sind so vielschichtig wie ihre Arbeitsweisen und da stellt sich tatsauml;chlich die Frage ob diesem kuuml;nstlerischen Gesamtwerk eine Struktur fehlt? Vergleicht man ihre Arbeit beispielsweise mit der von Cindy Sherman; fauml;llt sofort auf dass sich ein roter Faden durch dieses Werk zieht; nauml;mlich ihre Selbstinszenierungen in verschiedensten Kostuuml;mierungen; das Bild des Kouml;rpers und der Frau; fast immer umgesetzt im Medium Fotografie. Im Werk Martha Roslers; gibt es dagegen keinen Anhaltspunkt; der auml;hnlich augenfauml;llig ist wie Cindy Shermans Kostuuml;mierungen. Man kann sie nicht auf ein bestimmtes Thema oder Medium festlegen und muss oft lange nach ihrem Grundgedanken innerhalb eines einzelnen Werkes suchen. Gibt es trotzdem ein Grundkonzept in ihrem Werk; das dem Ganzen eine Struktur gibt; einen Zweck; ein Ziel? In dieser Hauptseminararbeit soll geklauml;rt werden; ob ihr Gesamtkonzept nur etwas tiefer unter der Oberflauml;che verborgen liegt; oder ob ihr OElig;vre schlicht und einfach ohne Zusammenhang ist.Dazu soll Kapitel 2 aufzeigen wie vielschichtig allein ihr Mediengebrauch ist; und ob diesem eine Methode zugrunde liegt. Im darauffolgenden Kapitel werden einige wichtige Arbeiten Themen untergeordnet und dabei auf wesentliche Gedanken hin untersucht. In einer Schlussbetrachtung soll sich herausstellen; ob sich diese Gedanken sogar zu einem werkuuml;bergreifenden Ziel formulieren lassen.
#983958 in eBooks 2013-06-06 2013-06-06File Name: B00D976Z6Y
Review
0 of 0 people found the following review helpful. Great read!By JDWas looking for work of Terry Prachett; and was very pleased with this stage adaptation. Can easily see this work in a play. Very pleased!0 of 0 people found the following review helpful. My favorite Pratchett novelBy Luxx MishleyTerry Pratchett is an insightful master of satire and literary/historical allusions. I cant help but feel that categorizing Prachett as "fantasy" is misleading; because there is much much more to his work than wizards and trolls; the fantastic elements serve as a background more than anything else; while the meat of his work focuses on much more universal themes.The Truth is the first Pratchett novel I ever read; and remains a favorite after all these years. At first I was a bit hesitant by the suggestion - after all; I really have no interest in reading about dwarves and elves and things of the like - but I was pleasantly surprised by what I found. Although there are several elements of "traditional" fantasy in Pratchetts Discworld books; the motifs are as much a part of his larger satirical work as the "main" subjects. You can take nothing in Pratchetts novels at face value; and his work is a delight for literature enthusiasts (I remember studying obscure 18th-century literature as an undergraduate; and stumbling across a reference to some of the same texts in a Pratchett book I happened to be reading).The Truth follows a hapless William de Worde as he accidentally becomes involved in the publication of Ankh Morporks first newspaper. Pratchett creates a world of fabulous characters as he examines how something as pedestrian as a newspaper can change the political and social landscape of a society - for better and for worse. He tackles subjects such as wealth and privilege; politics; and racial prejudices as he effortlessly satirizes all elements of various social institutions. No one is safe from Pratchetts scrutiny and wit; and the result is a truly entertaining and intelligent novel.For those who are unfamiliar with the Discworld novels; I always recommend The Truth first. I really feel that it has something for everyone; and serves as a wonderful introduction to Pratchetts style while delighting audiences of all kinds.1 of 1 people found the following review helpful. Funny as alwaysBy J. SwagmanThis book was very funny; and as usual when I read a Pratchett book; I find myself laughing aloud as I read it.This particular book is about the creation of the newspaper industry in the fictional Discworld. It reminded me a lot of "Going Postal" (the first book in this series I read) which traced the beginning of the Postal service in Discworld.Also thrown in is a parody of the Watergate/ Deep Throat story; and some light parodies of Nixon era conservatism and conservative values:"Apparently he says hes looking forward to a new era in our history and will put Ankh-Morpork back on the path of responsible citizenship; sir....Apparently he wants a return to the values and traditions that made this city great.""Does he know what those values and traditions were?" said Vimes; aghast.The photographer for the newspaper is a vampire with a fascination for flash photography. And if you think a vampire is the last person who should be playing with bright lights; perhaps you can see where some of the humor is going.Also like the other books in the discworld series; Pratchett does a clever job of explaining away potential anachronisms in his sword and sorcery era fantasy world. For example; there are cameras and tape recorders in this novel; but they are all powered by magical imps. (It is kind of similar to the old Flinstones gag of having all the modern appliances performed by dinosaurs.) Some of it boarders on corny; but mostly its good fun.